Metadata

Designation

Fields describing the legal status, recognition process, and temporal progression of areas across the Amazon.

Designation metadata documents the legal, institutional, and social status of an area — whether it is proposed, under review, partly recognized, or fully established — and ties each area to the legal instrument behind it.

Where Core metadata defines what an area is, Designation metadata records where it stands in its recognition process.

Fields

FieldDescriptionExample
designation_statusStage of recognition, from a controlled vocabulary (see below)Partly formalized
designation_yearYear the designation became effective1999
designation_authorityBody that issued the designationMinisterio del Ambiente
designation_instrumentLegal or institutional instrument supporting designationDecreto Ejecutivo No. 123
designation_historyReference to the historical designation processExternal record
designation_conflictWhether designation is contested or overlappingOverlapping claim with neighboring resguardo
designation_notesAdditional context or explanationBoundary expansion in 2015
designation_year and designation_history are managed through the designation timeline editor rather than as standalone inputs. designation_instrument replaces the earlier designation_source field, which is still read as a legacy key.

Status Vocabulary

Rather than asking each country to map its own categories onto a number, the Atlas records status as a controlled vocabulary and derives a standardized 1–5 progression scale from it. That scale is what makes designation comparable across legal systems.

ScaleStatusMeaning
1No processNo formal designation, recognition, titling, demarcation, registration, or official proposal process has been identified.
2ProposedA formal request, claim, application, proposal, or demand has been submitted or documented, but has not substantially advanced.
3In processThe area is undergoing technical studies, legal or administrative review, consultation, objection, validation, or another formal process step.
4Partly formalizedThe area has some official recognition, declaration, demarcation, boundary approval, or provisional status, but the process is not fully complete.
5FormalizedThe main legal act of designation, recognition, establishment, titling, homologation, or registration has been completed.
—UnknownAvailable information is insufficient, unclear, or not reported by the data provider.
The scale reflects progression, not quality. A higher score means recognition has advanced further, not that outcomes are better.

Role

Designation metadata is what lets the Atlas treat areas as processes rather than fixed categories. It does so in four ways.

Tracking Change

Because status is recorded over time, areas can be followed as they move from proposal to recognition, and expansions, upgrades, or legal changes become visible. Trajectories can then be compared across regions.

Comparability

The derived 1–5 scale gives a common reference across very different legal systems, which is what makes cross-country comparison and regional aggregation possible at all.

Indicators

Designation status is a key input for multiple Atlas indicators.

It feeds analysis of designation progress, conservation coverage over time, and the relationship between designation and stewardship.

Publication

Status also helps govern visibility. Early-stage areas (scale 1–2) are treated as draft or restricted, while areas at scale 3–5 become eligible for publication — so areas still in process are not exposed prematurely.

The designation_instrument and designation_authority fields together record the legal or institutional basis for an area. That might be a national law or decree, a ministerial resolution, an international recognition such as Ramsar, or a community or organizational agreement. Recording both supports verification, traceability, and linkage to official records.

Conflict and Overlap

The designation_conflict field captures overlapping claims, contested boundaries, and conflicting designations. It matters most in exactly the places where the data is hardest to pin down: regions where governance systems intersect or where recognition is incomplete.

Time

Three fields give designation its temporal dimension: designation_year marks when recognition took effect, designation_history records how status has changed, and designation_status reflects the current stage. Together they let an area be read as an evolving system rather than a single dated record.

In Practice

Designation metadata is updated as legal or institutional status changes, validated against official or recognized sources, and used to track both progress and uncertainty. Because designation is dynamic, these fields carry much of the change visible across the Atlas over time.

Example

FieldValue
designation_statusPartly formalized (scale 4)
designation_authorityMinisterio del Ambiente
designation_instrumentLey No. XXXX
designation_year2003
designation_conflict—
designation_notesExpanded in 2018