Data Sovereignty and Control
Atlas Amazon treats data as a strategic resource belonging to the peoples and communities it concerns. Openness is never a substitute for ownership, consent, and control.
What Data Sovereignty Means
That definition comes from the UN Human Rights Council’s Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in its study Right of Indigenous Peoples to data, including with regard to data collection and disaggregation (A/HRC/60/66).
It sits alongside the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance — Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics — which together guide how the Atlas approaches contribution, hosting, publication, and reuse. See also Open Data.
Partner Control
Following the CARE Principles and the Expert Mechanism’s study, partners must be able to:
- Control data collection, storage, and transmission across the project lifecycle
- Access their data at all times
- Be assured that no external parties have unauthorized access to their data
- Make their own decisions about sharing data with third parties
- Opt out or remove their data from the system at any time with minimal friction
These rights are fundamental and non-negotiable.
Why it Matters
Data about lands, territories, governance, and wellbeing has too often been collected, held, and reinterpreted without the consent or continuing authority of the peoples it describes.
Taking data sovereignty seriously therefore means treating control and repatriation as remedies for that history rather than optional features; designing the system so partners decide what is public, permissioned, or restricted; and making sure technical choices about hosting, access, and deletion follow governance decisions rather than the other way around.
The contribution, validation, and publication pathways in the Atlas are built to support these requirements in practice. The related technical choices are described under Data Hosting.